Blogiversity.org

Welcome to Blogiversity.org Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Blogiversity Links - online loans from America One : offering Life Lock discount

Psychology and You

September 2006 - Posts

  • Evolution, values and emotions

    “Evolution explains family values. The following characteristics are the foundation of families and societies and are shared by humans and other social mammals: attachment and bonding, cooperation and reciprocity, sympathy and empathy, conflict resolution, community concern and reputation anxiety, and response to group social norms. As a social primate species, we evolved morality to enhance the survival of both family and community. Subsequently, religions designed moral codes based on our evolved moral natures.” (Scientific American, Shermer, 2006)

    The bases of moral values could be seeing in whales and chimps. In human families we breed these values that are so important to the survival of the species. Each family has developed and specific set of values borrowed from the culture and give to them their own creative touch.

    Families also select a set of feelings and emotions in each member (from the ones available at birth) that are to survive and help the members communicate and adapt to their social environment. I call that emotional Darwinism.

    In some families the parents might neglect love in favor of anger or rationalization and coldness instead of either.

    Children are born with a whole set of emotions to interact with the world, parents teachers and other important adults will latter determine which emotions are going to survive and to what degree. These are the emotional patterns that become part of the scripts; each member will latter use a set of emotions to be able to relate with the social and physical world.


  • Biochemical bases for scripts

    Epigenesists could be understood as the processes of embryology seen as related, at each stage, to the status quo ante.

    “…early experience does profoundly mould the brain. However, it is not memory that it moulds at least, not memory as conventionally understood. What it actually moulds is the way genes work. A gene is a piece of DNA that encodes a protein molecule. In other words, it is a set of instructions. But instructions are no use unless they can be executed, and executed in an appropriate way. So cells contain a system to read genes, regulate their reading and convert the results into proteins, which then carry out various functions in the body. Part of this system is called epigenetic imprinting. This is a way of modifying how easily a gene can be read.” (The Economist, September, 2006)

    “Moshe Szyf, of McGill University in Montreal, studies the effect of maternal care on epigenetic imprinting. As he explained at this week’s meeting on Epigenetic and Neural Developmental Disorders, held in Beltsville, Maryland, imprinting might be a general mechanism whereby experiences are translated into behavior. If that turns out to be so, it will affect the understanding and treatment of mental illness. The first inkling of this came when Michael Meaney, one of Dr Szyf’s long term collaborators, noticed that rat pups whose mothers spent a lot of time licking and grooming them grew up to be less fearful and better adjusted adults than the offspring of neglectful mothers. Crucially, these well adjusted rats then gave their own babies the same type of care in effect, transmitting the behavior from mother to daughter by inducing similar epigenetic changes.”

    This theory if proven valid for other types of behaviors besides maternal care will give scripts a biochemical scientific bases.

    According to Dr. Moshe Szyf epigenetics can help trigger maternal caring behavior in rats. Such a behavior is latter tough by the well adjusted rats to their own babies. Baby rats on the other hand if not exposed to maternal caring behavior will express fear and anxiety and isolation-detachment.

    Here we find finally a link in between biochemistry, emotions and behavior. Of course the first emergent rudimentary behavior can be molded and further develop, at least in humans as well as primates by a copying process that can occur thanks to mirror cells.


  • Science and Psychoanalysis

    “Over the past decade, membership in the Society for Neuroscience has surged by almost 50 percent to 37,500. researchers are probing the brain with increasingly powerful tools, including superfast magnetic resonance imagers and microelectrodes that can detect the murmurs of individual brain calls. Nevertheless, the flood of data stemming from this research has failed so far to yield truly effective therapies for schizophrenia, depression, and other disorders, or a truly persuasive explanation of how brains make minds. ‘We’re still in the tinkering stage, preparadigm and pretheoretical’, says V.S. Ramachandran of the University of California at San Diego. ‘We’re still at the same stage physics was in the 19th century’. The postmodern perspective applies all too well to fields that attempt to explain us to ourselves. Theories of the mind never really die; they just go in and out of fashion. One astonishingly persistent theory is psychoanalysis, which Sigmund Freud invented a century ago. ‘Freud … captivates us even now’, Newsweek proclaimed just last March. Freud’s ideas have persisted not because they have been scientifically confirmed but because a century’s worth of research has not produced a paradigm powerful enough to render psychoanalysis obsolete once and for all. Freudians cannot point to unambiguous evidence of their paradigm’s superiority, but neither can proponents of more modern paradigms, whether behaviorism, evolutionary psychology, or psychopharmacology.” (John Horgan Discover, October, 2006).

    I disagree with the idea that Freud’s theory is still scientifically valid today. I think his theory belongs to the end of the 19th century where it should have been buried.

    Freud’s dream theory has been convincingly refuted by Allan Hobson.

    In spite of Mark Solms defense of repression we are still trying to find a convincing prove of its existence. Repression is supposed to be and unconscious mechanism created by the Ego in order to protect the person. Repression is characterized by the persons inability to remember the episodic part of the memory repressed. However that is not what we see in cases of Post Traumatic Syndrome. In these cases patients cannot forget the episodic component of the past. What we see in actual clinical practice are human beings that cannot forget the past and that do not repress it either, experiences they have lived often hunt them for the rest of their lives.

    Most people have had negative experiences while children in their families. Often this experiences are repeated over many times because they belong to the repertoire of behaviors that are part of their parent’s personality (of one or both parents). These past experiences have help mold their individuals scripts during their lives. Traumatic experiences serve a purpose, they help the person remember to stay away from live threatening situations, similarly to the ones experienced in the past. These experiences play and important role in preserving human live. Most individuals do not repress the traumatic experiences that happened to them but instead remember it too frequently specially when something associated with it is perceived by them.

    Elizabeth Loftus the memory expert has expressed her reluctance to believe in the mechanism of repression. We are still looking for the mechanism of repression and still have not found it in any memory laboratory.

    Children that have been severely abused exhibit something similar to repression as it can be seeing in cases of multiple personalities. The cognitive and neurological explanation for cases like this is that there is damage to the hippocampus. Integration of the different personalities in cases as this have not been documented, rather the patient usually selects one of its personality modes preferably the most functional one.

    Freud’s theory of personality development as well as his Oedipus complex, Elektra complex and other sexual explanations of human behavior lack any scientific value and therefore are not worth discussing.

    I like the cognitive explanation of the unconscious it is to me a scientific explanation, repression does not play a role or is part of it.

  • Emotions and decisions

    We all know that emotions can derail an adequate decision making process, however few people seem to know how important emotions are to this same process.

    As Antonio R. Damasio has proven there is an important interaction in between the systems in charge of emotions, reasoning and decision making.

    Patients with frontal lobe damage have problems making up their minds about what to do, in spite of conserving intact their reasoning power, this happens because they have a considerable decrement in their emotional capacity.

    Emotions allow us to make up our minds quickly when we face complex situations that demand a fast decision, with of course a margin or error. We face often complex social problems, as well as other difficult problems of a different nature, whose analysis if done properly could take us days or even weeks. Emotions allow us to make up our mind quickly and with little hesitation. Without such a mechanism we wouldn’t have survived through evolution.


  • Cognitive Therapy

    Cognitive therapy is one of the most important advances in the treatment of mental diseases in the last 50 years. The therapy is a counseling technique in which patients learn to head off or defuse self-defeating thoughts before acting on them.

    Dr. Beck set a new standard for determining the effectiveness of any type of psychotherapy, the Lasker jury said, by testing his radical new methods in clinical studies with a degree of rigor not previously applied to any form of talk therapy, including Freudian psychoanalysis. Dr. Beck published much of his work in his own journal, Cognitive Therapy and Research, in part because other psychiatrists resisted, if not rejected, his findings.

    Dr. Beck understood the reluctance. In a letter in The New York Times on March 6, 1983, he wrote that he empathized with his critics. He said that in the late 1950’s his research had "set out to prove that anger turned against the self played a central role in depression," but to his surprise it "ultimately refuted this hypothesis."

    Dr Aaron T Beck the psychiatrist who upset Freudian dogma in the 1960’s by developing cognitive therapy is one of five winners of this year’s Lasker Awards, widely considered the nation’s most prestigious medical prizes. Dr. Beck’s technique, cognitive therapy, transformed the treatment of depression and many other mental health conditions.
  • Humanistic psychotherapy, cognition and scripts.

    Handling script’s change strategies with patients through cognitive communication is also part of humanistic psychotherapy.

    Through cognitive communication a psychotherapists can discuss with his patient the problems he is facing. He can also examine and analyze possible scenarios and solutions as well as strategies and the time and places to implement them; that is how cognitive communication is applied.

    However when a patient is upset or in crisis active listening and empathy through client center psychotherapy is the best method.


  • Humanistic psychotherapy and scripts

    But how does working with scripts related to humanistic psychotherapy?.

    As we said before, in order for a person to grow the self’s core has to be involved.

    With scripts emotional patterns guide behavior. On the other hand emotions are link to the self’s core, therefore in order to change or generate a new set of emotions to guide a particular behavior the core needs to be open to some degree.

    The person need in others words to experience himself or herself in a new relationship or social context to be able to elicit new emotions. Neurotic defenses usually hamper such a growth, It is when we defend our neurotics ways of behaving and refuse to try new ways of feeling and acting that we close our possibilities to grow and become different.