An Alternative
Monday, March 08, 2010 2:59 PM
Last week I posted a blog about how and why I don't self-publish, including why I don't put my material on this very blog, including the fact that magazines don't want to republish something that's been put on the web. Most magazines include the stipulation, however, that they won't publish anything that is in the public domain, as in available for anyone to see on the internet. An alternative so that my friends and family could read whatever I am working if they feel so inclined would be for me to set up (and I'm not totally sure how to do this although I think I did it in a college computer literacy course) a password protected webpage and have my material posted on their. Anyone who wanted to read it would need the web address, a user name and a password.

As I am always looking for readers but never want to haggle anyone to read my stuff, this may be a great, easy way to make my writing available to select people for feedback and essentially leave an open invitation for them to do so. This alternative is a promising compromise to the request I had from a friend to read more of my material online (he had read the short short I had published on 365 Tomorrows) while still maintaing the professional integrity of only accepting publication to legitimate forums for my work.

My web design skills are limited but I'm going to have to look more into this idea. Until then, back to the book.

My name is Eric and I'm an unpublished fiction writer.

84 days to deadline, ten chapters complete.
by DMI | with no comments
Add to Bloglines Add to Del.icio.us Add to digg Add to Facebook Add to Google Bookmarks Add to Newsvine Add to reddit Add to Stumble Upon Add to Shoutwire Add to Squidoo Add to Technorati Add to Yahoo My Web
Why I Don't Publish Here
Tuesday, March 02, 2010 5:14 PM
A friend of mine recently asked why I didn't put more of my work online and why I don't publish to my blog. I explained that in high school I had a live journal that I filled with poetry and young, amateurish drivel but even then I didn't consider myself published in anyway, not even self-published. Someone who self publishes at least pays to have their work in print, even if it's unedited, un-produced, and unfiltered in anyway (and unlikely to be read by anyone the author doesn't put the book in their hand). I recently saw a few science fiction writers speak in a symposium at USF and one of them noted that "any fool" can get published on the internet. In the sense that anyone can do what I'm doing now and make a blog for free and with relative ease and put written material on it, that is true.  Right now I could fill this blog up with dozens (and I mean dozens) of short stories or put them in a livejournal or break them up into tweets or all three plus some.

Problem is, that holds no real value, in part because it's just too damn easy and in part because no one would really care to read it. I know I wouldn't because, lots of people do that and I say pass. If I'm going to spend my time reading something I want it to be good. I want to know an editor with tastes I like looked at the piece and approved. Even if the magazine doesn't pay, only publishes online and is run by a volunteer staff of more or less amateurs who merely appreciate the medium and want to see more fiction available for people to read, it is still leaps and bounds ahead of anything published on a blog in my opinion. Just the act of having someone read what I wrote in a pile of possible work and say, "that one," makes having my material somewhere worth something more than having it just sitting on my desktop or a blog. 

It isn't about being snooty, it's about having standards, even if vague ones. It's the same reason I send a story to a high-paying journal with lots of readers before I send it to a low-paying (or no-paying) e-zine. Of course I want someone to read my stuff, but once it's online it's more or less worthless. A publisher won't touch. It loses all value. So in part it's about getting paid and about trying to have a lot of people read what I've written instead of just my relatives and friends. But it's also about respectably. No one cares if I publish to my blog. People (readers, writers, editors, me) care if I'm in a magazine like Analog or The Atlantic Monthly.

So no offense blogiversity, but I won't be putting any of my writing up here anytime soon.

Until next time, I'm Eric and I'm an unpublished writer.

90 days to deadline, 10 chapters complete.
by DMI | with no comments
Filed under:
Add to Bloglines Add to Del.icio.us Add to digg Add to Facebook Add to Google Bookmarks Add to Newsvine Add to reddit Add to Stumble Upon Add to Shoutwire Add to Squidoo Add to Technorati Add to Yahoo My Web
The First Thirteen
Thursday, February 25, 2010 3:41 PM
The most important part of any story is probably the beginning. A reader or editor might not like the end, it might leave them completely unsatisfied, or even angry but the fact is, they wouldn't have read to the end or even the middle if the beginning wasn't strong enough to pull them. Some say the most swamped editorial staffs and slush readers will only read the first thirteen lines of every story and from those thirteen decide whether it is strong enough for them to push forward.

Why the first thirteen lines? Simple. When a manuscript is submitted in proper format, with a heading that includes the author's name and address, doublespace with the word count and the title, then some empty space, there will be thirteen lines of actual story on the first page and if an author can't get them to turn that first page... rejection.

A good thirteen lines has to be interesting, quick paced and contain all the basic initial story elements: a protagonist who wants something facing a problem. The forum of science fiction writer Orson Scott Card's website is devoted to the first 13 lines, allowing people to post the first 13 of their stories for people to comment and critique. The website is www.hatrack.com.

Until next time, I'm Eric and I'm an unpublished writer.

95 days until deadline, nine chapters complete.
by DMI | 1 comment(s)
Filed under: ,
Add to Bloglines Add to Del.icio.us Add to digg Add to Facebook Add to Google Bookmarks Add to Newsvine Add to reddit Add to Stumble Upon Add to Shoutwire Add to Squidoo Add to Technorati Add to Yahoo My Web
Software Review: StoryMill
Friday, February 19, 2010 3:52 PM
Men and women have been writing fine novels without the help of a word processor for centuries, dabbing ink onto parchments and scrolling free hand into notebooks, and I have no doubt that people will continue to write novels with no more than simple text input programs or the monolith that is MS Word. No new program can truly improve your writing any more than a new type of pen can. But, they can make things a little easier. A program I've been using for larger projects, including the novel I'm currently writing (broke 30,000 words today!), is called StoryMill. StoryMill is produced by Mariner Software for Mac and costs $49.95.

On its most basic level, StoryMill is a word processor. When you first open the program you are greeted by a window divided into five sections, not counting the bottom bar that says stuff like "Page 1 of 1." The top section is the toolbar, fully customizable though your options are limited. Below that are three columns. The middle and by far the biggest is split in half horizontally. You do your writing in the bottom half, the blank page, and on top of that it shows you what you are writing in. Much like iTunes, the left hand column is for organization, one of the program's greatest strengths. If you click on 'Chapters' the top half of the middle will display a list of your chapters (just like a playlist) and from there you can click on one of those and then see what you've written in the chapter. Besides 'chapters,' the program preloads with a 'characters' playlist as well as 'locations,' 'tasks,' 'scenes' and 'research.' The far right column is a place for tags, notes and the display of data such as how many words are in your current viewed document.

This all-inclusive organization is without a doubt the programs greatest strength. Without having several different programs open or thirty word documents and a dozen finder folders a writer has everything in their project at their finger tips in a single window. You can go from working in a chapter to re-reading that character sketch your wrote by just clicking over to the characters view. These 'playlists' are also customizable (for my science fiction novel I have chapters, characters, planets and moons, other locations, races, research notes, tasks, and finally submissions) and a double click will produce a chapter or locations description in a separate window if you want to have them both open at the same time. I haven't found much use for the tags function but others might and the ability to insert hyperlink annotations into the text is a nice touch that I imagine someone writing a piece of nonfiction that had a lot of research would put to good use.

Other nice features include a full screen capability comparable to WriteRoom and a fun, ultra-simple, must-have delight is the progress bar. Located in the toolbar, you can adjust the progress bar to be a timer or take count of how many words you've written since you opened the program. I've set mine to 1000 words, the bare minimum I must write everyday, and as a blue bar extends as though I were downloading something and a sound chimes when I reach my goal. There is also a "project goal" progress meter. Mine is set to 100,000 words, a ballpark for novel length. I know it sounds quaint but I've come to love it and rely on it just as I often use the full screen (what StoryMill touts as a "distraction free writing environment"). My only qualm is that I can't put whatever sound I want in there. How I long to hear Han Solo yell, "Lets blow this thing and go home," every time I reach my goal.

There are a host of problems with the software, however, not the least of which being a frustratingly unusable timeline feature. Maybe I just never figured it out, but I played with it for a long time and couldn't figure out how to get the events I was inserting to be at any other time than the time I was inserting them at. I don't need a day planner or a calendar I want to timeline my damn book. The timeline is also tied to scenes which StoryMill uses as a way to break up your chapters into individual elements. It sounded like a good idea but it just turned out to be cumbersome (notice that 'scenes' wasn't one of my organizational categories). Another little annoying problem is a lack of hot keys for certain features. I love me my hot keys.

All in all, it has been a great program that I despite its short comings but I have to say that there is a lot of room for improvement. First of all, there needs to be support for multiple drafts. Right now you can label your character sketch or chapter as being draft one or two or finished and it'll be given a different color coded bar in the selection window. This is a nice visual touch, but there is no way within the program to retain a previous draft. So far I've been saving older copies of chapters to independent word documents (grrr...). Speaking of saving to windows, there is an export feature that is so lacking in usability I've resorted to select-all, copy and paste. For someone who likes to be able to back things up, a simple to use but versatile exporter than saves to .doc and .rtf is a must. I browsed through Mariner's web forums and discovered that  support for drafts is in the works for the next version. While we're adding things to the StoryMill wish list, better stat tracking would be nice such a feature that can tell me what chapter is the longest, which the shortest, etc. and while they're building in draft compatibility I'd like to see something comparable to MS Word's track changes and insert comments function.

If you like the idea of WriteRoom and have out grown MS Word in terms of needing to organize and better attack a large scale writing project, despite its flaws and large room for improvement, I'd definitely recommend StoryMill. Its worked for me so far and there's no sign that will change. You may want to hold out for the next version because the price is a little high, but that's to be expected. I give StoryMill four out of five pens.

Until next time, I'm Eric and I'm an unpublished fiction writer.

101 days until deadline, eight chapters complete.
by DMI | with no comments
Add to Bloglines Add to Del.icio.us Add to digg Add to Facebook Add to Google Bookmarks Add to Newsvine Add to reddit Add to Stumble Upon Add to Shoutwire Add to Squidoo Add to Technorati Add to Yahoo My Web
Don't wait 'till later, back up your data!
Monday, February 15, 2010 4:29 PM
Today, a quick bit of very simple advice that I'm sure you've heard before but I'd hate for anyone, writer or not, to overlook. Save often and back up your data! I thought of this as I was copying all my files to an external hard disk today, something I do periodically but should probably get in the habit of doing once a week or so, especially since I don't have a second volume big enough to take advantage of apple's time machine. I used to use The Automator program that comes with the mac to copy a set number of folders routinely to my external hard drive (geekly named "Resurrection Ship") but they changed the program with the new OS and I lost that ability. Now I just do the old fashioned drag and drop, but un-flashy as that may be, it's necessary! Magazines used to warn submitting writers to never send their only copy of a story. Silly I know, but if your hard drive crashes and the only copy of your story has been mailed off to The New Yorker, then you can kiss all of that work good bye. Who's silly now?

If you're not backing up your data go buy an external hard drive and start! It's not much work (or much money anymore) and while the computer copies files in the background you can go about your writing, or whatever it is you do. It's just as important to make sure you're saving your work in case of a sudden power outage. I personally am in the habit of hitting command-S every time I pause to think.

There are tons of easy ways to back-up and protect your data as well as all your important paper documents. For more about this, read the article Digitize your Documents that I wrote for Tallahassee Magazine.

Until next time, I'm Eric and I'm an unpublished (more accurately, unpaid) writer.

105 days until deadline, six chapters complete.
by DMI | 1 comment(s)
Add to Bloglines Add to Del.icio.us Add to digg Add to Facebook Add to Google Bookmarks Add to Newsvine Add to reddit Add to Stumble Upon Add to Shoutwire Add to Squidoo Add to Technorati Add to Yahoo My Web
Not a lack of experience but a lack of success
Thursday, February 11, 2010 2:59 PM
I wanted to make it clear that the indecision in my previous blog post between which method of writing and constructing various drafts works best, even for me personally, come not from a lack of experience but a lack of success. While I have tried both many times and done numerous combinations of the two, what keeps me from definitively saying which way I would recommend or which I personally prefer stems from the fact that I have never really seen either way amount to much as I have only published one story on a non-paying and somewhat obscure website (no offense intended towards anyone at 365, I love you guys). While I write for hours upon hours everyday, churning out stories and chapters, writing and revising, outlining and editing, I just feel a little uncomfortable saying, "this is what works," because in all honesty I don't know.

If I'm lucky, maybe one day I'll be able to say what works and these blog posts can be looked back on and read as a how-to. For now though, this isn't a how-to but a what-to-try. And that's all I'm doing: trying. Everyday is an adventure.

Until next time, I'm Eric and I'm an unpublished writer.

109 days until deadline, five chapters done.
by DMI | with no comments
Add to Bloglines Add to Del.icio.us Add to digg Add to Facebook Add to Google Bookmarks Add to Newsvine Add to reddit Add to Stumble Upon Add to Shoutwire Add to Squidoo Add to Technorati Add to Yahoo My Web
The difference between editing and revising and whether or not these things are even necessary
Tuesday, February 09, 2010 2:45 PM
Last night I was talking with my sister and brother-in-law about how some people need to revise and some write a first draft that is basically the final draft. We weren't just discussing fiction which few people write, but writing papers for school. My sister is a high school english teacher and my brother-in-law used to be a college professor and they were commenting on how some students could write a single draft the day before it was due and still turn out a quality paper. In college creative writing classes, professors endeavor to "demystify" the first draft and advocate a method where you just write down all of your ideas and get the story on paper without worrying about how good or bad it is, then you can go back and fix it by placing no importance on what you've already written. Essentially, the first draft is suppose to be quick and disposable. Some writers even advocate something called a "zero-draft," as opposed to a first draft, where one would basically free write, intermingling ideas, notes and rough drafts of actual scenes and exposition to be featured in revised form in later drafts before one even attempts a full first draft.

The problem I've always had with this methodology with writing fiction is that all my life in school I was the kind of student that wrote the first and only draft the night before a paper was due and then I almost always got an 'A' (and if I didn't it had nothing to do with the writing). Quick side note, correcting grammar, syntax and typos is not revising a draft, that is editing. Anything I write (even this blog) has to be proofread. That is editing. Revising involves making significant changes in how a paper or story looks such as deleting scenes, moving paragraphs around, rewriting dialogue, changing characters and tailoring the length.

My brother-in-law made the interesting point that some people need to write a first draft before they can even think about how they want the final draft to appear while the people who successfully write a first and only draft often do more preparatory work and are thinking about the paper before they write it. I can back that up. In school, I always did all my research and outlining well in advance and had everything mapped out by the time I actually sat down to write. My question now is, why should my fiction writing be any different just because the PHDs told me so?

Don't get me wrong, I learned so much from the english professors at FSU and they will get a great deal of credit if I ever make something of myself but I can't help but wonder if here they may have been wrong for me. Different strokes for different folks right? My all time favorite author, Heinlein, said in his essay, "On the Writing of Speculative Fiction," that one of his rules for writing was that, "You must refrain from rewriting except to editorial order." This flies against everything I was taught in fiction class! It also made me think, "damn, is everything I've ever read of Heinlein's first draft!" Probably not but I think he was one of those writers who thought and planned things out before starting. I'm sure he edited and was edited and had to change some stuff to make if fit for certain markets ("editorial order") but perhaps the whole revision thing isn't as big a deal as I thought it was.

I can now confess that I have sent some stories to magazines, including "Why I hate the Colonists," the short short I had published on 365Tomorrows, after only editing and minor revision, no rewriting involved. Others I have subjected to a great deal of rewriting and I think for the most part they needed it. It will be interesting to see which stories eventually get published and what methods I used on those. For now, all I can do is continue to measure the need for revision on a case to case basis and tell anyone else, aspiring fiction writer or student, you'll just have to determine what kind of a writer you are.

All this came up because my brother-in-law finished reading the first complete draft of a lengthy story of mine and we were discussing potential revisions. I'd like to thank him for doing that for me as well as an old friend from high school, Meagan, who did the same. It's hard to get honest assessments of my work and I'm starved to have anyone read it and tell me what they think so, to both of you, thank you very much. It is certainly one of the stories that needs some work.

Until next, I'm Eric and I'm an unpublished writer.

111 days until deadline, five chapters complete.
by DMI | with no comments
Add to Bloglines Add to Del.icio.us Add to digg Add to Facebook Add to Google Bookmarks Add to Newsvine Add to reddit Add to Stumble Upon Add to Shoutwire Add to Squidoo Add to Technorati Add to Yahoo My Web
Software Review: WriteRoom
Wednesday, February 03, 2010 1:15 PM
Welcome to the first Eric: Unpublished software review! Today I'll be taking a look at WriteRoom (http://www.hogbaysoftware.com/products/writeroom), software that's been available since before 2007, when its creator started charging for it ($24.95) and has since inspired a slew of other free knock offs and the incorporation of its main device into larger, more complicated and more expensive writing programs. But I wanted to try out the original.

The original, so to speak anyways. What WriteRoom does is simple, your screen goes completely black and you are faced with a solitary, blinking green box. All you can do is type and you are alone with your writing. Immersive and distraction free, the simplicity of WriteRoom recreates the minimalist, early twentieth century writer's bare walled apartment, barren desk and loan type writer in the cluttered digital world of e-mail, web-surfing and font book. Whether you're a professional fiction writer or a student trying to get a paper in on time, write room is an arm sweeping across your cluttered desktop.

If you haven't tried full screen writing, I'd suggest you download the free trial of WriteRoom and give it a shot and see if it is something you like. It is certainly worth at least that. But as form follows function, the minimalism of the program extends to its every corner and you may find that you'll miss much of what MS Word has to offer. While WriteRoom is customizable, allowing you to change that blank black screen to white or a nice shade of purple and the same goes for the font color and style, having to go to preferences to fiddle with all that, for me, quickly got tiresome. You could argue that's the point, leave it alone and just write (which I did at length during the course of trying it out, penning an entire short story in an afternoon), but don't expect anything besides the matrix-like interface and the same nagging feeling you get from a blank page.

The program does offer some amenities. Spelling errors will still be underlined in red, if you move your mouse to the bottom left corner you get a word count, the screen automatically adjusts so that you don't end up typing on the bottom of your computer screen and it saves to .txt files so there's no worries when it comes to open that same document in other word processor when you're done so that you can play with the fonts and get your work ready for printing.

While we all have WriteRoom's creator to thank for this great idea, especially if full screen is something you really dig, the present price, existence of other similar programs, and the incorporation of a full screen feature into more heavy duty programs such as Story Mill and Scrivener has put the original out of business in the opinion of this humble blogger. Those two other programs may be more expensive but they come packed with so many more features that can help you with your writing that they might be more worth buying, even if you only intend to use the full screen feature and ignore all those other bells and whistles.

WriteRoom may accomplish what it set out to do but it fails to reach beyond that in any way and has been overtaken by other writing softwares. I would recommend trying it to anyone, but I doubt more than a few will care to buy it, even if they enjoy the immersive writing experience. I give WriteRoom 3 out of 5 pens.

Until next time, I'm Eric and I'm an unpublished writer.

118 days to deadline, four chapters complete.

by DMI | with no comments
Add to Bloglines Add to Del.icio.us Add to digg Add to Facebook Add to Google Bookmarks Add to Newsvine Add to reddit Add to Stumble Upon Add to Shoutwire Add to Squidoo Add to Technorati Add to Yahoo My Web
June 1st Deadline
Monday, February 01, 2010 4:49 PM
I mentioned last week that I wrote two chapters in my novel and the week before that I wrote one. In all honesty, that was starting over and rewriting or doing second drafts of the beginning I already wrote so that brings me up to three chapters in total this go around. I started chapter four today and got about half way through it. My goal is to write a chapter a week and start or finish the next, or finish a chapter and then write another, in essence scribe three chapters every two weeks, four if I can pull it off. I've talked about how you need to set goals and write everyday if you're going to be a successful writer. Writing everyday is something I've got down solid. The goals, however, have been a bit lofty and vague. So, today I'm announcing that I intend to have the first draft of my first book, in its entirety, complete by the first day of June. I'm not sure how many chapters exactly the work is going to be but I'm going to ball park at being somewhere between 25 and 30. There are 18 weeks between now and my deadline. If I write two a week that'll give me 39 (remember, I've already got three). If I do three every two weeks as I laid out above I'll end up with 30 (that's not counting the three I've already got), my high estimate of total chapters. There you have it, a fire under my ass and the math to fuel it.

To some, it might seem lofty for me to try and write so many chapters and essentially pen an entire book in four months, but I think I can do this for a variety of reasons. For one, I've been working on this project for a long time. I thought up the very broad, most basic part of the story in my ninth grade biology class (not that it has anything at all to do with biology) and I've been thinking about it since, slowly building on it and writing ideas down. About a nine months ago I actually tried writing a few chapters, the chapters I edited or rewrote the last two weeks, so I've started already. And more than just a hand full of chapters, I've developed large quantities of background information and sketched out several of the characters as well as making outlines and maps and so on.

All that said, it's difficult to just assign yourself a deadline though. I know, I've done it before. What's different this time is that I'm announcing it to all of you here, in this public forum so all of you can hold me to that promise. Plus a little incentive helps. In addition to the incentive of making my dreams come true and getting a novel published before more of my grandparents pass on I've set the date around the time a friend of my finishes an internship that is taking up all of his time. With that behind him and hopefully this enormous undertaken behind me, we'll both be in for a break. If I complete the project on deadline, JC and I are going to spend a few days relaxing and playing Zelda.

Until next time, I'm Eric and I'm an unpublished writer.

120 days until deadline, three chapters complete.

by DMI | with no comments
Filed under: , , ,
Add to Bloglines Add to Del.icio.us Add to digg Add to Facebook Add to Google Bookmarks Add to Newsvine Add to reddit Add to Stumble Upon Add to Shoutwire Add to Squidoo Add to Technorati Add to Yahoo My Web
Plotting the Course
Friday, January 29, 2010 11:17 AM
I believe it was Joan d'Arc that said, "I never for a moment lose sight of my divine mission. Everything else is a means to that end." I wouldn't dare presume that I have a divine mission in my literary goals but the point she makes is a relevant one. Keep your objective in mind and work towards that. This can be applied to the how a writer manages his or her time, making sure that the tasks that you devote yourself too contribute to your goals or on the much small scale of a single story. In his 1947 essay, "On the Writing of Speculative Fiction," my favorite author Heinlein said "You must finish what you start." He may have been talking about finishing the stories that you start but I took it to mean that within a story itself you must solve the problems that you create and the end must fit the rest of the tale. A rock that trips up a lot of amateur writers is creating a clear conflict or problem in the beginning of the story, complicating things along the way, this raises the stakes and builds the tension to a climax where, in the end, that conflict is resolved.

With these things in mind I'd like to point out a flow chart method of sorts that I won't fully take credit for "inventing" but I didn't learn it in writing school. I'm just convinced that there is nothing new under the sun and in the plethora of books about writing someone expounded on a similar technique. Regardless, this is something I do. Instead of drawing an up-side-down check mark or creating an outline (I do but of those sometimes too) I will write on a piece of paper or my white board three words as underlined headers of columns, "Problems," "Complications," and finally "Resolutions." Then I write all the stuff that happens in the story with arrows pointing to show how one event complicates one problem and then how it leads to the prescribed resolution. Hey, I didn't say I reinvented the wheel here, it's just a simple way of keeping things straight if you can't do it in your head. I find it particularly helpful in organizing stories with multiple plot lines and problems.

A quick update on how the week went. Two more rejections, two more chapters written in the book! Plugging away at another short story and I deployed another handful of submissions. I'm feeling pretty good, over all.

Until next time, I'm Eric and I'm an unpublished writer.

by DMI | with no comments
Add to Bloglines Add to Del.icio.us Add to digg Add to Facebook Add to Google Bookmarks Add to Newsvine Add to reddit Add to Stumble Upon Add to Shoutwire Add to Squidoo Add to Technorati Add to Yahoo My Web
George Singleton and a long, littered road
Monday, January 25, 2010 2:28 PM
I recently read a humorous article by writer George Singleton published in the Oxford American called "How to Write Stories...And lose weight, clean up the environment and make a million dollars." If you're not familiar with Singleton he is a hilarious "southern" writer whose stories I really enjoy, usually having to stop several times in the middle to roll around on the floor, and after I read I come to the conclusion that I will never write anything that witty. If I come up with a one-liner I'm pretty pleased with myself. This guy makes a whole story out of them making them add up into funnier situational jokes and story that has some kind of meaning that I can't quite put my finger on but according to several former literature professors I shouldn't try to analyze so I just drop it. They always told me this with a mystical look in their eyes like that matronly relative talking about the undefinable uniqueness of their spaghetti recipe (I'm on to you Aunt Cissy!).

I digress. The basic point of the article, which no one should take too seriously, is that you should wake up, write 1,000 words and then walk down the road picking up cans. The next day you do the same thing. The walking will help you lose weight, the picking up cans will clean up the environment and then you can sell them to buy postage to mail your stories out. By the end of the week you've got a couple bucks worth of aluminum and one short story. Skip ahead a few years and you might be published in a few magazines. After twenty you'll be a successful writer.

Singleton doesn't fail to point out that if you have a job or a spouse this plan might not work but the real point behind his humor is clear. No one gets to be a writer overnight and if you aren't willing to deal with that and put in a lot of work, "then, don't write."

by DMI | with no comments
Add to Bloglines Add to Del.icio.us Add to digg Add to Facebook Add to Google Bookmarks Add to Newsvine Add to reddit Add to Stumble Upon Add to Shoutwire Add to Squidoo Add to Technorati Add to Yahoo My Web
Looking back at an old story; Looking back at a successful week
Friday, January 22, 2010 1:50 PM
Too often in this quest, I find myself having to give up because something I'm trying to write or trying to revise just isn't working and I don't know how to fix it. I'm faced with the choice of continuing to stare at my computer screen not accomplishing anything or give up and try something else. For the sake of my sanity and being productive, my modus operandi in this situation has been to give up, but that is never easy and always a little painful. Every new idea, every story is something that excites and propels me to write. Maybe this could be the one, maybe this will the story I knock out of the park, that really kicks ass and magazines can't wait to publish. I know, I need to chill. I'm becoming more realistic about my expectations but each failed story feels like a personal failure and set back.

Earlier this week, just after I opened the web browser and navigated here to find my shiny new blog, I decided to pick up an old story. Not that old, I wrote it last summer and my then fiancee gave me some great criticism but I struggled in the revision process. I had a professor tell me once to give it some time between writing and revising but I usually take that to mean a few days or a week. Well, half a year later I started reading through my wife's comments and looking at the draft that just wasn't where I wanted it to be and with time's gift of a new perspective, I fixed the damn thing. I won't be so bold to say, look for it in a fiction magazine near you, but I can warn editors, look for it in a submission box near you.

There is a great deal of joy when you complete the task of turning vision to reality and on that high note I'd like to mention the success of this week as a whole. Besides the redemption of an old failure and the brand spanking new blog, I broke ground on a promising new story (to which I will return following this entry) and I scribed another chapter in the novel. Add in a few more stories I moved along in the submission process, I'd call that a pretty successful week. Maybe one of the most productive in quite awhile.

Until next time, I'm Eric and I'm an unpublished fiction writer.

by DMI | with no comments
Filed under: , , ,
Add to Bloglines Add to Del.icio.us Add to digg Add to Facebook Add to Google Bookmarks Add to Newsvine Add to reddit Add to Stumble Upon Add to Shoutwire Add to Squidoo Add to Technorati Add to Yahoo My Web
Facelift
Tuesday, January 19, 2010 10:33 AM
I'd like to give a big ole thanks to Will Burns of Blogiversity for giving my blog this amazing facelift! I hope my readers enjoy this crisp new look as much as I do. The font is of the courier suite which I requested because that is the standard for manuscript formatting (other rules on manuscript formatting can be found here: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~mslee/format.html). Blue is my favorite color and I love the new graphic banner that captures my frustration and my warrior spirit (if my hair gets any longer I might be able to pull of that samurai bun). You did an excellent job, Mr. Burns.

A change like this one can often bring reinvigoration to an endeavor, shaking up the normal goings-on and providing a rush of air into idle lungs. And it can be the same with writing. I began reading a book recently that I'd been meaning to get to for some time. "The Hero with a Thousand Faces," by Joseph Campbell is a study of the archetypal hero's journey through classic myths and legends from around the world. I heard about the book in college through a friend taking a course in mythology and even read some of the handouts he got on Campbell's studies that laid out the archetypal story lines of a hero's journey. In fact, I did everything but attend the class, as I read the material and helped him write papers. Recently, I was reminded of the book while watching a documentary on Star Wars where George Lucas said he began writing his famous story while taking Campbell's class. My wife bought the book for me (the latest edition has Luke Skywalker on the cover, though Campbell doesn't talk about the trilogy in the book) and now as I've begun reading it I have attacked my novel with renewed vigor. I never stopped working on it, but in the last few weeks my efforts have been split and the time I spent on the book was in writing about the fictional world in which it was set, pre-writing in other words. A necessary task, to be sure, but now I find myself giving that first chapter a facelift and having written quite a lot just in this morning as my hero encounters what Campbell deems, "The Call to Adventure."

Until next time, I'm Eric and I'm an unpublished fiction writer.

by DMI | 1 comment(s)
Add to Bloglines Add to Del.icio.us Add to digg Add to Facebook Add to Google Bookmarks Add to Newsvine Add to reddit Add to Stumble Upon Add to Shoutwire Add to Squidoo Add to Technorati Add to Yahoo My Web
What a Writer Wants in Rejection
Thursday, January 14, 2010 2:49 PM
I recently got a rejection letter that made me so excited you would have thought rejection was what I was going for. I get a lot of these things and normally they aren't worth mentioning to my wife, so when I said, "Hey, honey, I got an awesome letter from a magazine I submitted to," you can imagine how confused she was when I said they didn't want my stuff (not to mention a little peeved for getting her hopes up, but I like to have fun like that). Even though they were rejecting my work, I was excited because in their e-mail they included the brief commentary of two different readers who had read my story. It wasn't much but for a guy starving for anyone to look at his material it was enough to send me through the roof, especially since some of what they mentioned was very fixable and not all of the rest was bad. Too put a cherry on top, they got back to me within five days! FIVE! That's unheard of. The speed demons will get things back to you in a couple of weeks. Five days, in my experience is unprecedented.

What magnificent magazine deserves credit for this fine feat of rejection? "Mindflights." http://mindflights.com/

You see, normally what you get back from a magazine is a form rejection. These under staffed institutions are so swamped with submissions that they don't have time to write a letter to the writer about why they aren't accepting their work and make suggestions to fix it. It's sad but understandable. Out of these form rejections I expect only simples niceties and platitudes such as "thank you for submitting your story," "unfortunately, we're going to pass on your work," "good luck placing your work elsewhere," and "tastes vary by market." I haven't gotten a form rejection that really made me mad, although it's nice when it comes with some cool letterhead. Esquire's was neat though, it included a lengthy list of tips on submitting specifically to them, such as what exactly they are and are not looking for.

The worst thing of course, is to never hear back and, unfortunately, sometimes that happens. It's even worse than that time I got my story back with a green post-it note that said, "Sorry, we are no longer accepting fiction." Hey, they at least sent me back my story. I suppose the only thing that could have improved Mindflight's rejection would have been some cool letterhead. Or an acceptance.

Until next time, I'm Eric and I'm still writing and submitting.

by DMI | 1 comment(s)
Filed under: ,
Add to Bloglines Add to Del.icio.us Add to digg Add to Facebook Add to Google Bookmarks Add to Newsvine Add to reddit Add to Stumble Upon Add to Shoutwire Add to Squidoo Add to Technorati Add to Yahoo My Web
If you're bored, good God, think of your readers!
Friday, January 08, 2010 4:51 PM
The week didn't go exactly as planned but, what does? By Tuesday I was bored with the Sulphur Springs story. It just wasn't working. I didn't care about the character, the dialogue wasn't funny, and the action was going nowhere. As I was trying to muscle farther into it on Wednesday I realized, if I'm bored by my own story, why on Earth would a slush reader be interested and why would an editor want to publish it? If you can't entertain yourself, who can you entertain? (Interestingly enough, that is among the rejected Russel Crowe lines from the movie "Gladiator.")

So I gave it up. I didn't delete it or anything and maybe I'll come back to it later if the mood strikes me, but it until then, there is no sense wasting my precious writing time doing something I don't enjoy and generally slows me down. Sulphur Springs may have failed (or did I fail it?) but the week was not a total loss. Actually, I wouldn't call it a loss at all. I did a significant amount of work on the novel and churned out out two scifi flash fiction pieces. To round out this little progress report, I sent two stories off to mags and did some research into submitting to others. Mostly that includes low to no pay, small operation online stuff, but if I can't get a story taken by the major mags I might as well try it there and see if it helps get my name out.

Definitely planning to keep up the work on the novel next week but I'm still up in there about what short story project I want to try and tackle. I've got a huge bag of ideas to pull from and more than a few stories I started and never finished. I don't even know if I want to try mainstream literary or more science fiction. Whatever I decide I just hope I have better luck than I did with Sulphur Springs.

Until next time, I'm Eric and I'm a hard working amateur fiction writer.

by DMI | with no comments
Add to Bloglines Add to Del.icio.us Add to digg Add to Facebook Add to Google Bookmarks Add to Newsvine Add to reddit Add to Stumble Upon Add to Shoutwire Add to Squidoo Add to Technorati Add to Yahoo My Web
More Posts Next page »